Tuesday, July 24, 2007

The greatest threat to peace in Nepal is misinformed, misguided, agenda-driven journalists like "The Guardian's" Isabel Hilton

(Courtesy: el Punto)

Isabel Hilton: "The greatest threat to peace in Nepal is military impunity"

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,2130575,00.html

Isabel Hilton's twisted and misleading critique of the Nepalese Army is anything but professional journalism. Her writing in The Guardian is a piece of intentionally misinformed, left-wing trash. It is distasteful propaganda that amalgamates fact with fiction, pointedly undermines reforms undertaken by the Nepalese Army, uplifts Nepal's Maoist agenda, and strains an already fragile peace process.

Examples of the half-truths in Isabel Hilton's reporting are as follows:

  • There is no mention of any explicit number of Maoist combatants to be integrated into the Nepalese Army - how could there possibly be such a number when the peace agreement was signed before the verification of combatants was complete?
  • A political agreement has not been reached on how/if "certified" Maoist combatants are to be integrated into the Nepalese Army - integration is certainly on the Maoist "wish-list" but is not the foregone conclusion that Isable Hilton presents it to be.
  • The only thing "savage" about "Gyanendra's" war against the Maoists was the Maoists prancing around the countryside using villagers as human shields, assassinating political opponents, slitting throats of teachers and reporters, and decapitating their fallen comrades - the war was neither Gyanendra's, nor was it any more "savage" than war in general.
  • The MoD may be the centre of focus for Isabel's criticism but it's the DFID sponsored version of the DDR model that Nepal's Maoists are categorically rejecting - Isabel would do well to investigate this further, so her writing doesn't come off completely in line with Maoist propaganda.

It is "thanks" to reporting like Isabel's that a discredited monarch continues to receive far more attention than he deserves. Instead of undermining the monarchy's value to a future Nepal, occasional reminders like Isabel's suggest a magnitude of control that Gyanendra simply does not have.

The fact is, neither Gyanendra, nor General Katual (individually or in tandem) have sufficient popular support to challenge the Maoists or the alliance of semi-feudal (Bahnun dominated) political parties in Nepal. Claims to the contrary are wishful thinking of the variety that preoccupy two groups - the hardcore, avowed Royalists and the ever-conspiracy conscious Maoists. Any takers on where Isabel's loyalties lie?

If Isabel had true cause for concern over Nepal's peace process, she may have criticized the United Nations for bargaining over the number of disqualified combatants (with the Maoists), or perhaps she could have mentioned the injustice that hundreds of thousands of Maoist victims continue to face - a fact of Nepal's 12-year long civil war that the international media refuses to report on.

But what is Isabel's focus? She hones in on the tragedy of Maina Sunwar, a case that has been internationalized and one that Hilton knows will resonate with every feeling and breathing human being (irrespective of his/her political inclination). Isabel Hilton brazenly abuses Maina's tragedy to fuel hatred against an institution she has little, if any first hand knowledge (or understanding) of.

For Isabel, the only issue is the impunity she parrots the Nepalese Army enjoys. For those familiar with the details of Nepal's 12 year insurgency, the issue is implication by association of each and every solider and officer who was ordered into combat, every politician (many of whom are currently represented in Nepal's interim parliament) who endorsed military action, and every single Maoist cadre who either committed first degree murder (or was party to such crimes against humanity).

Just because Isabel Hilton had no clue what went on in Nepal from 1990 till she decided to take up the Maoists' cause in 2005, doesn't excuse the Maoists for their heinous crimes against the Nepali people. Just because Isabel's telling is exclusively focused on the atrocities committed by 0.001% of a 90,000 strong national army, it doesn't erase the crimes to which 100% of Nepal's political leadership is party.

Isabel makes no mention of the current Prime Minister's (Girija Prasad Koirala) previous resignation from office on the grounds that the Nepali Army refused to engage the Maoists in combat. Had Isabel been aware of this fact, what would her criticism be then? Would it be that the Nepalese Army refused to kill its own people under orders from a democratically elected Prime Minster and thus, the Nepalese Army continues to be undemocratic? Probably. Because this is how twisted, ideologically brainwashed logic works.

What about operations Romeo or Sierra-II Kilo - the root causes of the armed Maoist rebellion? It is peculiar that Isabel makes no mention of such landmark "events" when criticizing Nepal's security forces. Could it be that that the massacre of thousands of villagers in Rukkum and Rolpa are best ignored because such operations were launched under the auspices of a "democratic" government and a "democratic" police force?

These are the larger issues that papers like "The Guardian" systematically overlook. Questions are forwarded but are posed in accusatory fashion with selective background and substance that guides readers to premature conclusions.

If Isabel Hilton's objective was to raise a stink about the Nepalese Army's human rights record, she has certainly made her mark. But at the same time, Isabel should know that the Nepalese Army is not the same old punching bag that will sit by idly and watch as its name and reputation are tarnished yet again.

The Nepalese Army is no longer operationally incapacitated by conflicting direction from the Palace Secretariat and Army HQ. The face of the Nepalese Army is a public relations Officer on whom a failed Maoist assassination attempt was launched. There are women serving in the ranks of the Nepalese Army (many of them, widowed by Maoist insurgents). The Nepalese Army's attitude and commitment to democratic rule is unconditional; as a demonstration of professional solidarity, not a single serving Officer attended King Gyanendra's birthday celebration. There have been more acts of visible discipline against the Officer Corps. over the past year and half than the last 7 years combined. Comparatively, the Officer Corps. of the Nepalese Army is a glowing display of ethnic representation – it is unclear which decade of data Hilton bases her racially divisive allegation on. But of course, these statistics are meaningless to Isabel Hilton because they don't support either her's or her Maoist buddies' cause.

Hilton ridicules General Katuwal's up-brining as an orphan. She shamelessly leverages the pain and mental torture of Maina Sunwar's family. She uses both arguments in pursuit of her own radical ultra-left wing ideology. Hilton portrays herself as a defender of human rights but doesn't skip a beat when equating a living human being to a "souvenir." If this isn't hypocrisy what is? And all this drama, in the name of peace for Nepal?

Here's a revelation for Hilton: If Nepal's peace process is derailed, it won't be because of General Katuwal, it won't be because of the Nepalese Army and it certainly won't be because of a spent King. It will be because of misguided media mavericks like Isabel Hilton who revel in expounding baseless theories in the international press, flaunting their non-existent expertise, and endangering a delicate process of political reconciliation that ideologues like Hilton love to hate.

Related Posts:

Thank You Daniela - But Nepal is Already on "Plan B"
http://nepaliperspectives.blogspot.com/2007/05/thank-you-daniela-but-nepal-is-already.html

What Next?
http://nepaliperspectives.blogspot.com/2007/03/what-next.html

Hedging Against Nepal's Leadership Crisis
http://nepaliperspectives.blogspot.com/2006/09/hedging-against-nepals-leadership.html

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

Isabela Hilton joins a long line of useful idiots who do not understand Nepali politics but who form a part of this vast media space who need a reason for their existence. Her article does not even qualify as a good leftist piece.

Anonymous said...

This charade has gone on long enough.

The allegations of rights abuses should be investiagted right up the chain of command, ending with the Home Minister and Defense Ministers when rights abuses happened and they should all be put away.

Furthermore, this double standard of penalizing amry men but not penalizing the politicians who ordered them to fight has gone on for long enough.

Impunity runs thick in the ranks of Nepal's interim parliament and this is an issue that should also be addressed.

Anonymous said...

As Hon. Pradeep Gyawali (MP, UML) said it straight - The maoists are as guilty of human rights abuses as some of the army personell,- they should not act as if they are saints.
There is no use trying to find fault in army men and women who have been following orders from the likes of the same people who are running the nation right now. The army have acted on orders from democratically elected governments (barring the direct rule of Gyanenedra who continued the process on), while the maoists have acted on orders of their leaders who have lost democratic elections not once but twice. I wonder where Hilton was when Prachanda and Baburam was hobnobbing with Kofi Annan and other esteemed personalities from the EU? The single act of pre planned explosion of a bus in Magdi, Chitwan where 40 people were murdered (several babies as well) and many more disabled for life should have prompted Hilton to bring up the subject of gross human rights violations by maoists. Granted this article is oit at the time of Katwal's visit, but talk about not painting both sides of the story. I did'nt read any press concerning rights abuses by maoists when there was this high profile visit to Europe by the duo. But then the Chitwan bombings probably took place before Hilton decided to take up the maoist cause deciding to restrict her knowledge to army misadventures only before she got an urge.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous, you are absolutely right.

It is in times like these that people like Pradeep Gyawali and KP Oli need to speak up. I am very big fan of KP Oli. It is unforutnate that he is unwell because he would be giving the Maoists a good run for their money too.

This game of double standards has got to end and it has got to end NOW.

Anonymous said...

Jhalak you and anonymous are absolutely right.

Anonymous said...

I read both Isabel Hilton's writing and this critique. I agree with the overall message that Hilton is trying to convey but I also agree that she has an agenda with it and that her writing is full of factual inconsistencies. Unprofessional journalism, if you will.

Anonymous said...

The other thing that really gets on my nerves is why none of non-Maoist officials in Nepal ever refute allegations that are made in the press? If I were General Katuwal, I would file a lawsuit against The Guaridian for defamatory, non-factual, character assassination.

The more these "experts" on Nepal get away with, the more encouraged they become and the more lies the world hears about Nepal. This should also stop.

Anonymous said...

As for Hilton's view from the tinted red glass- it just goes to prove, given incentives even a low smut can spew diatribe that has no bearing or even half truth. As for Army people not attending King's birthday bash-you'd surprised how many came even against the HQ order. That said, it is quite heart breaking to see schism growing even among the rank and file of RNA. So if something is not done- we will have situation like in Africas where warloards among the rank and file of RNA fight it out to get the power.

As for media is concerned, correct the misinformed, misguided and agenda-driven local media in order to avoid shallow and loose comments from likes of Hiltons

Anonymous said...

The only motive of the maoist is to make army weak and replace it by PLA. The means they have adopted are propoganda, merging convert them to PLA. Once the PLA become successful to overtake the army from inside by majority, then they capture the power solely. Mr. Girija and Mr. Sitaula is being a good ladder to them.

Anonymous said...

Hey Anonymous (12:12 PM) - I also heard conflicting remarks about the birthday party. Can you tell me who from the active army went to the King's birthday and also, can you confirm for sure that there was orders from the Army NOT TO attend the birthday party?

There seem to be diffent reports on both issues.

Anonymous said...

Sitaula is Girija's pro-maoist faction head.

Girija also has an anti-maoist faction.

The maoists also know what Girija is up to.

If given a choice I wonder who people would side with, Girija or Prachanda?

Anonymous said...

Armymen were present, I was there and they informed me about explict order from HQ not to attend the birthday bash.

Sad thing is- army is like a lost dog which does not have a master- so anything can happen. Katwaul is at loose end and leadership is eroding due to suspended situation for the Army. This is what SPAM is hoping for, I guess its a play designed by India to make Army internally weak and they will pressure parties to make full frontal attack which will create disarry and then collapse from within and then resurrection as people's army with inclusion of PLA. The endgame to make Nepal a subservient and India to take Nepal into its militaristic wing or national security (India's) umbrella. Its not far fetched, especially with China moving in with grants and donation and cosy relationship with Maoist. Now the upmanship will be between China and India- and Maoist know this and will have fall back position if things come to head.

By demeaning Monarchy- parties are creating slave mentality, orientation towards disintegration, and loss of pride and nationhood. But all is well with them- they prosper only when there is instability, insecurity, and mayhem. This is what gives them importance and identity, not when its other way round.
DOA

Looking Past the Moment of Truth

Dear Nepali Perspectives, I had written what is below in response to an article that came out on Republica.  I may have written someth...